This is the quintessential example of the consequences of the slippery slope. I saw this story about the election of a new leader for the Episcopal Church. Man, do I have to take issue with this entire situation.
First off, I believe that Scripture is clear about the fact that only men are called to be pastors and elders. The fact that the church allows female bishops is already a smudging of God’s Word. But, that wasn’t even the item that bothered me the most. No, that came with the following quotes:
Interviewed on CNN, Jefferts Schori was asked if it was a sin to be homosexual.
“I don’t believe so. I believe that God creates us with different gifts. Each one of us comes into this world with a different collection of things that challenge us and things that give us joy and allow us to bless the world around us,” she said.
“Some people come into this world with affections ordered toward other people of the same gender and some people come into this world with affections directed at people of the other gender.”
The interviewer pressed her concerning Scripture that contradicted her opinion:
Asked how she reconciled her position on homosexuality with specific passages in the Bible declaring sexual relations between men an abomination, Jefferts Schori said the Bible was written in a very different historical context by people asking different questions.
“The Bible has a great deal to teach us about how to live as human beings. The Bible does not have so much to teach us about what sorts of food to eat, what sorts of clothes to wear — there are rules in the Bible about those that we don’t observe today,” she said.
Let that sink in a second. How, exactly, does the leadership of a major American denomination that proclaims to follow Jesus Christ get so out of sync with the Word? It’s the gradual, methodical slide of compromise that has made its way into the hierarchy.
She has fallen into the politically correct assumption that homosexual behavior is genetic and cannot be controlled. Guess what? People are born with genetic predispositions to sinful behavior every day. It happens to be an area of their life that they need to learn to master with God’s power. We don’t tell alcohol or drug addicts that that’s just the way they are, so live with it. No, we try to help them fight their tendency toward addiction. We don’t excuse those who have a predisposition to kleptomania. Why have we selected out this behavior as one that should be excused?
Then, the excuse that the Bible doesn’t cover all of life is a beauty. I’m sorry, but how exactly to you prevent believers from simply saying, “Well, I choose not to follow the rules about sex outside of marriage. I choose not to follow the rules about lying.” How is that any different than her excuse to say she chooses ignore the rules about sexual behavior? Besides that fact, she’s using a false analogy to make her argument. It’s a long way from food preparation rules to sexual behavior rules. That same analogy can be used to dismiss any part of the Bible. What use is it then?
I ask the same question that I always ask those who pose that excuse. If you can pick and choose which parts to believe, why do you believe any of it? What validity does it have at all if you get to simply decide what’s valid?
I’m sorry to say that I’m not surprised, but I am deeply disappointed.